Paul Burstow MP

Representing Belmont, Cheam, Stoneleigh, Sutton and Worcester Park

MP blasts "sham" consultation after final blow is delivered to local post office network

12.00.00am GMT Wed 5th Jan 2005

Responding to the announcement of the closure of Stonecot Hill sub-post office, Paul Burstow, MP for Sutton and Cheam spoke of the "sham" consultation process leading to yet another post office closure in the area.

Taking the toll to a total of six post office closures announced in recent weeks in the Sutton and Cheam constituency alone, Paul Burstow MP commented:

"Post Office Ltd has succeeded in its intention to axe all six local post offices earmarked for closure last year as part of its dubiously titled 'network reinvention' programme.

"The fact that it took Post Office Ltd only twelve working days over the Christmas holiday period to come to conclusion to close the Stonecot Hill branch adds weight to the view that the whole consultation process has been an utter sham.

"The hurried decision to close yet another vital service to the local community leads one to question the extent to which further substantial consultation took place, or whether they were just delaying the bad news until after the holiday period."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Previous news story: Burstow takes campaign to stop disability benefits centre closure to Parliament (Wed 22nd Dec 2004).
Next news story: Paul Burstow backs St Helier as right site for new hospital as Sutton site emerges as front runner (Mon 10th Jan 2005).

Related News Stories:

Fri 6th Jun 2008:

Wed 7th May 2008:

Tue 1st Apr 2008:

Mon 3rd Dec 2007:

Wed 28th Nov 2007:

Mon 28th Mar 2005:

Mon 20th Sep 2004:

Thu 9th Sep 2004:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
"Published and promoted by Pauline Penneck on behalf of Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrats), both of 234 Gander Green Lane, Cheam SM3 9QF.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.